Please refer to the documentation for your Unix-like system on the installation of software. GIMP can also run on Solaris and is available for the BSD family of systems such as FreeBSD and OpenBSD. You can always fall back to using the following command line:įlatpak update Systems without flatpak support Once again, if your distribution does not have proper support, Instead if yourĭistribution and/or desktop has a good support for flatpak, it Work!) when a new version of GIMP is released. Have to come back on this page and install again (it will not This installation will also provide regular update. The meantime, you can still run it by command line (not as the
If this is not the case, we suggest to report a bug to yourĭesktop or distribution asking for proper support of flatpak. Once installed, it will be made available exactly the same wayĪs other applications (menus, desktop overview, or any specificĪpplication launch process used by your desktop). Install GIMP, then manually install by command line: Installed and if clicking the link still does not prompt to Out-of-the-box on some platforms since the flatpak technology is The flatpak link above should open your software installerĪnd prompt you to install GIMP. Therefore choose your installation medium according to your
Will likely provide faster updates, following GIMP releases
The flatpak build is new and has known limitations, though it If available, the official package from your Unix-likeĭistribution is the recommended method of installing GIMP! ( note: i386 and ARM-32 versions used to be published, yetĪre now stuck at GIMP 2.10.14 and 2.10.22 respectively). The fix is to redesign the memory management method for Calc sheets and has nothing to do with 32/64 bit issues.Flatpak build available in: x86-64 and AArch64 16 bit allows indices up to 65,536 so, if 65,536 is the limit in the number of columns, it is likely to be a historical 16 bit limit unless both row number and column number are contained in the same index number.Įdit: Column number seems to be a memory management problem, where even tiny sheets need to use much more memory if the column number is increased. That being said, I somehow doubt that 60,000 columns is a 32/64 bit limit as 32 bit allows indices up to 4,294,967,296. How many users want 60k+ columns in a spreadsheet compared with how many users don't? This has been the case for well over 10 years, so this whole attitude of, oh well we really don't need 64 bit why bother is just becoming a very negative excuse.įeature enhancement is about getting the maximum benefit for the maximum number of users with the available, always limited, resource. Coldwash wrote:Ever try using Calc for more than ~60k Columns?.
0 kommentar(er)
